, January 21, 2022

0 results found in this keyword

Vallejo to appeal judge’s ruling in Angel Ramos lawsuit


  •   3 min reads
Vallejo to appeal judge’s ruling in Angel Ramos lawsuit
Angel Ramos' sisters speak at a protest in Oakland. Photo: Bradley Allen / Indybay.org

VALLEJO – The city of Vallejo has filed a notice of appeal asking a federal appeals court to reverse a judge’s recent ruling  allowing a wrongful death lawsuit filed on behalf of Angel Ramos’ family to proceed against the police officer who shot and killed him.

Court records show the city filed the notice on Dec. 16, asking the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a Dec. 9 decision from U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley, who denied the city’s motion for summary judgment in the lawsuit. Nunley’s ruling cleared the way for the lawsuit to proceed to a jury trial.  

Vallejo police officer Zachary Jacobsen shot and killed Ramos, 21, during a family fight  in January 2017.

However, civil rights attorney Melissa Nold, who is representing Ramos’ family, said it was “somewhat surprising” that the city decided to appeal Nunley’s ruling.

“The city isn’t very competent, so I think they are trying to buy some time,” Nold added. “It’s just a waste of taxpayer dollars at this point.”

Nold said that she will file a document with Nunley’s court challenging the city’s appeal as frivolous.

Vallejo City Attorney Veronica Nebb couldn’t be reached for comment.

Filed by the city in May 2019, the motion for summary judgment required Nunley to review the evidence presented so far and determine if there was enough for the lawsuit to go to trial. Nunley found there was sufficient evidence that the lawsuit should go before a jury, noting that several items in the case should be reviewed by a jury.

Nunley highlighted a claim in Jacobsen’s deposition, that the officer misidentified Ramos’ ethnicity and what he was wearing when he shot and killed him.

“By his own testimony, Jacobsen first saw a black man in jeans with a knife, and this was a predicate for fatally shooting a Hispanic man in boxers,” Nunley wrote. “Whether this ‘mistake’ was reasonable is a question that must be resolved by a jury and cannot be disposed of on summary judgment.”

Jacobson and his partner, Matt Samida, responded to reports of a fight at a Sacramento Street home during the early morning hours of Jan. 23, 2017. Jacobsen reported that he heard yelling and screaming from the home and saw several people on a second story balcony fighting.

The officer said he saw Ramos holding a large knife at shoulder level – which Ramos’ family strongly denies – and ran from inside the house, mounted another man, later identified as Deshon Wilson, and began making stabbing motions.

But Ramos' family argues that he came out of the house and kneeled over Wilson. They also presented deposition testimony from Wilson, Samida and Officer Jeremy Callinan where each testified that they did not see a knife.

“The undisputed facts are that Ramos and Wilson were engaged in an altercation where Ramos was on top of Wilson,” Nunley wrote.

Nunley further said that the family “raised a genuine dispute as to whether it was reasonable for Jacobsen to believe Ramos had a knife and was stabbing Wilson, and therefore, whether it was reasonable for Jacobsen to believe that Ramos posed an immediate threat to officers or others. This question must be resolved by a jury.”

A Vallejo Police Department board of review cleared Jacobsen of any wrongdoing more than a year after the shooting. The board wrote that Jacobsen used reasonable force but the officer was admonished for not activating his body-worn camera during the incident.

The Solano County District Attorney’s Office also cleared Jacobsen of any wrongdoing in February 2018.

Can you pitch in for independent news owned and operated by journalists?

Our reporting takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. There are two great ways to support it:

You've successfully subscribed to The Vallejo Sun
Great! Next, complete checkout for full access to The Vallejo Sun
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in
Success! Your account is fully activated, you now have access to all content.
Success! Your billing info is updated.
Billing info update failed.
Your link has expired.